Directed by Ruben Ostlund. A celebrity couple on a luxury cruise discovers that social hierarchy is turned upside down after a storm.
Triangle of Sadness won the Palme d'Or at Cannes 2022, making Ruben Ostlund one of the few directors to win twice. The savage social satire follows models, oligarchs, and billionaires on a luxury yacht that becomes a stage for class warfare when disaster strikes.
Watch the official trailer, then continue with the full festival context below.
Ostlund wields cringe comedy like a weapon. Triangle of Sadness is blunt, sometimes crude, but undeniably effective as a satire of wealth and power. Dolly de Leon is the film's secret weapon as the toilet manager who becomes queen.
The infamous dinner sequence aboard the yacht features an extended scene of passengers becoming violently ill during a storm, while the captain (Woody Harrelson) and a Russian oligarch debate capitalism vs. communism over the intercom. The scene is deliberately excessive and polarizing.
Yes, Ruben Ostlund is one of only nine directors to win the Palme d'Or twice, having previously won for The Square in 2017. He joins a select group that includes Francis Ford Coppola, the Dardenne Brothers, and Michael Haneke.
Triangle of Sadness was directed by Ruben Ostlund.
Triangle of Sadness has a runtime of 147 minutes (2 hours and 27 minutes).
This expanded section is designed for search, AI answers, and viewers who want stronger context before choosing what to watch next.
Triangle of Sadness (2022) is best understood as both a standalone film and a product of the festival ecosystem that shaped its reception. Festival audiences often encounter films before distribution campaigns define the mainstream narrative, which means early reactions focus on craft, risk, and originality. That context matters because it explains why certain titles become conversation leaders months before a wider release. On FestivalMovie, we keep that chronology visible so you can trace how a film moved from premiere response to broader cultural attention.
For viewers, the most useful question is not only whether a film is "good," but what kind of attention it asks from you. Some titles reward patience and visual reading; others are built around character tension, political urgency, or formal experimentation. Reading a film through this lens helps you decide when to watch it, who to watch with, and what companion films to queue after. That is why we pair editorial framing with practical discovery paths rather than relying on a single rating snapshot.
Festival programming also changes the way films are discussed. A world premiere seen in a major competition can trigger discourse around awards prospects, while the same film in a side section may be approached as a breakout discovery. This page preserves those distinctions so your expectations stay calibrated. If you are building a long-term watchlist, these distinctions save time: you can prioritize titles based on tone, momentum, and accessibility instead of chasing every headline.
Another key layer is distribution timing. A film can generate intense discussion at a festival and still take months to appear in theaters or on streaming. During that gap, context often fragments across social posts, interviews, and partial reviews. Our approach is to consolidate the essentials into one clean pathway: what the film is doing artistically, how audiences first reacted, where it sits in the director's body of work, and how you can keep exploring similar titles while you wait to watch.
Start with intent: do you want emotional impact, formal experimentation, social commentary, or genre reinvention. This page gives you that framing first so your viewing expectations are aligned and you can decide whether to watch now or bookmark for a specific mood.
Festival context captures first-response energy before marketing narratives settle in. It reveals what critics, programmers, and early audiences identified as distinctive, and it helps you separate signal from hype when planning your watchlist.
Compare by tone, pace, and thematic ambition instead of simple genre labels. Use the recommendation cards on this page as a starting map, then branch into Radar and Guides to find films that share emotional texture or narrative risk.
Yes. You can scan key takeaways and watch options in under a minute, then move into the deeper editorial sections to understand performance, style, and place within current festival cinema trends.
Use Bridge for availability, Radar for momentum, Passport for regional exploration, and Guides for curated watch sequences. This workflow gives you a repeatable system for discovering films with intent instead of relying on algorithmic randomness.
Festival reception often reframes how audiences read a film after wide release. For Triangle of Sadness (2022), the strongest signal comes from early programming context, immediate critical discourse, and how quickly the title entered broader recommendation loops. Seeing those signals together helps viewers decide whether to prioritize this film now or pair it with adjacent titles first.
Another useful lens is watch strategy. Some films reward active discussion right after viewing; others benefit from a quiet first watch and a deeper second pass. This page is intentionally structured so you can use either approach without losing momentum: trailer first, context second, and discovery pathways last.
Watch with minimal distraction, then use the surrounding sections on this page to compare themes, tone, and festival reception before jumping to the next recommendation.
Yes. Festival context helps separate marketing noise from artistic intent, which usually leads to better watchlist decisions and fewer mismatched expectations.
From an editorial recommendation perspective, Triangle of Sadness (2022) is a title where framing materially changes viewer response. Instead of treating it as a simple yes/no recommendation, this page now emphasizes how to approach it based on craft, pace, and thematic intensity.
The strongest practical anchors are direction by Ruben Ostlund, runtime at 147 minutes, and launch context through Cannes Film Festival 2022. These details help viewers set expectations accurately, especially when deciding between this film and other nearby options in the same discovery session.
Award signal remains important (Palme d'Or), but award labels are only one layer. The goal is to reduce random browsing and increase intentional curation across festival, streaming, and regional context.
Use the trailer and key takeaways together: trailer gives tone and texture, takeaways clarify pacing and intent. If both align with your current mood, watch now; if not, save it for a focused session.
It connects metadata to editorial framing and practical next steps, so discovery becomes a coherent path across Radar, Bridge, Guides, and Passport.
Continue discovery with 2 collection hubs and 8 directly related films.
Collection hubs: Criterion Channel Festival Classics | Cannes Palme d'Or Winners and Contenders
8 related films: Uncle Boonmee Who Can Recall His Past Lives (2010) | Uncut Gems (2019) | Under the Skin (2013) | Victoria (2015) | Volver (2006) | Waves (2019) | Whiplash (2014) | Winter Sleep (2014)
More discovery: Bridge | Now Streaming | Festival Radar | Guides